MTH3003 Lecture 17
Lagrange’s theorem tells us only what subgroup orders are forbidden - the size of any subgroup must divide . The converse fails: knowing doesn’t guarantee a subgroup of order ( has order but no subgroup of order ). Sylow’s three theorems give a partial converse: they guarantee subgroups of any prime-power order dividing , control how those subgroups are related, and count exactly how many there are. They are one of the most powerful structural results in finite group theory.
Definitions
-Group, -Subgroup
Fix a prime . A group is a -group if for some . If is a -group, is a -subgroup of .
Sylow -Subgroup
Let be finite and let be a prime dividing . Write
A Sylow -subgroup (or -Sylow subgroup) of is a subgroup with - i.e. the largest possible -subgroup of .
Examples
- has order , so it is a -group. As a subgroup of , it is a -subgroup.
- has order , which is not a prime power, so is not a -group.
- The Klein four-group is a -group (), and a -subgroup of .
- . A Sylow -subgroup has order , a Sylow -subgroup has order , a Sylow -subgroup has order . A subgroup of of order is a -subgroup but not a Sylow -subgroup (it’s not maximal).
Sylow’s Theorems
First Sylow Theorem
Let be a finite group. If a prime divides , then has at least one Sylow -subgroup.
Second Sylow Theorem
Let be finite with Sylow -subgroup . If is any -subgroup of (not necessarily Sylow), then for some . So all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, and every -subgroup sits inside some Sylow -subgroup.
Third Sylow Theorem
Let be the number of Sylow -subgroups of . Then:
- (where with );
- .
Why these matter
- First Sylow guarantees existence of a maximum-size -subgroup for each prime dividing .
- Second Sylow says they’re all conjugate - there’s structurally only one “kind” of Sylow -subgroup.
- Third Sylow counts them: is constrained by two divisibility conditions, often pinning it down uniquely.
Combined, the three theorems often determine all groups of a given order. Hugely powerful.
Note
The First Sylow Theorem generalises Cauchy’s theorem, which says: if divides , then has a subgroup of order (i.e. an element of order ). Sylow upgrades this to subgroups of order .
Quick Examples
Example: Group of Order 54
Question
Let . Show has a subgroup of order and one of order .
. By Sylow’s First Theorem applied with , has a Sylow -subgroup of order . Applied with , has a Sylow -subgroup of order .
Example: Sylow Subgroups of
. So has Sylow -subgroups of order and Sylow -subgroups of order .
- Sylow -subgroup: .
- Sylow -subgroup: any order- reflection generates one, .
Example: Sylow Subgroups of
. So Sylow -subgroups have order , Sylow -subgroups order , Sylow -subgroups order .
- is a Sylow -subgroup.
- is a Sylow -subgroup.
- is a -subgroup but not Sylow (order , not ).
Application: Every Group of Order 162 has a Normal Subgroup of Order 81
Example
Let . Prove has a normal subgroup of order .
.
Claim 1. has a subgroup of order . By the First Sylow Theorem, the Sylow -subgroup exists.
Claim 2. is the only Sylow -subgroup. By the Third Sylow Theorem, and . The first condition says ; the second forces . The only common value is .
Claim 3. is normal. Fix . The conjugate is a subgroup (Quick Subgroup Test), with , so it is a Sylow -subgroup. Since there’s only one of those, for all . So .
Recurring pattern
If a Sylow -subgroup is unique (i.e. ), then it is automatically normal - because conjugation permutes the Sylow -subgroups, and there’s nothing else to permute it to.
Application: Every Group of Order 15 is Cyclic
Example
Let . Prove .
.
Claim 1. Subgroups of have orders (Lagrange).
Claim 2. Only the trivial subgroup has order , only has order .
Claim 3. has only one subgroup of order . By Sylow, every -subgroup of is a Sylow -subgroup (since , no larger -subgroup is possible). By the Third Sylow Theorem, and , giving .
Claim 4. has only one subgroup of order . Same argument with : and , so .
Claim 5. is cyclic. Let be the unique subgroup of order and the unique subgroup of order . The four subgroups of are . By inclusion-exclusion,
Since , there exists with and . Then , but , so . Hence is cyclic.
Proof of First Sylow (sketch - not examinable)
Note
Idea: act on subsets of size by left multiplication; use a divisibility argument and the Orbit-Stabiliser theorem to extract one whose stabiliser has order .
Let , . Let be the set of all subsets of of size . By a standard binomial-coefficient calculation,
A power of dividing also divides (and vice versa), so all -factors cancel between numerator and denominator. Hence .
acts on by . Partition into orbits; since , at least one orbit has . Let .
By Orbit-Stabiliser theorem, . Write with ; then . For we need , i.e. .
Now show . Fix and consider the orbit . If with , then (right-cancel by ). So . Also because stabilises . Hence .
Combined: , forcing , so . Thus is a Sylow -subgroup.
Proof of Second and Third Sylow (advanced - not examinable)
These rely on conjugation actions on the set of cosets (for the Second) and on the set of all Sylow -subgroups (for the Third), combined with the Orbit-Stabiliser theorem and a fixed-point argument. Definitions used:
- Centraliser .
- Normaliser for .
- Conjugacy classes: orbits of on itself under .
Full proofs are in the lecture notes handout - examinable spirit is the application, not the derivation.
Pre-Lecture Notes from mth3003 lecture notes 17.pdf
- -group: order is a prime power . Sylow -subgroup of : subgroup of size when , - the maximum possible -subgroup.
- First Sylow Theorem: existence - for every prime , has at least one Sylow -subgroup.
- Second Sylow Theorem: structure - all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate; every -subgroup sits inside some Sylow.
- Third Sylow Theorem: counting - AND . Often pins uniquely.
- Generalises Cauchy: prime subgroup of order (and now: order ).
- Application 1: every group of order 162 has a normal subgroup of order 81. (Sylow uniqueness normality.)
- Application 2: every group of order is cyclic. (Two unique Sylow subgroups; counting gives an element of order .)
- Standard pattern: count via , often forces , hence the Sylow is normal, often the group is a direct product or cyclic.
- Next lecture: more applications of Sylow - classifying small groups, finishing the course.