MTH3003 Lecture 17

Lagrange’s theorem tells us only what subgroup orders are forbidden - the size of any subgroup must divide . The converse fails: knowing doesn’t guarantee a subgroup of order ( has order but no subgroup of order ). Sylow’s three theorems give a partial converse: they guarantee subgroups of any prime-power order dividing , control how those subgroups are related, and count exactly how many there are. They are one of the most powerful structural results in finite group theory.

Definitions

-Group, -Subgroup

Fix a prime . A group is a -group if for some . If is a -group, is a -subgroup of .

Sylow -Subgroup

Let be finite and let be a prime dividing . Write

A Sylow -subgroup (or -Sylow subgroup) of is a subgroup with - i.e. the largest possible -subgroup of .

Examples

  • has order , so it is a -group. As a subgroup of , it is a -subgroup.
  • has order , which is not a prime power, so is not a -group.
  • The Klein four-group is a -group (), and a -subgroup of .
  • . A Sylow -subgroup has order , a Sylow -subgroup has order , a Sylow -subgroup has order . A subgroup of of order is a -subgroup but not a Sylow -subgroup (it’s not maximal).

Sylow’s Theorems

First Sylow Theorem

Let be a finite group. If a prime divides , then has at least one Sylow -subgroup.

Second Sylow Theorem

Let be finite with Sylow -subgroup . If is any -subgroup of (not necessarily Sylow), then for some . So all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, and every -subgroup sits inside some Sylow -subgroup.

Third Sylow Theorem

Let be the number of Sylow -subgroups of . Then:

  1. (where with );
  2. .

Why these matter

  • First Sylow guarantees existence of a maximum-size -subgroup for each prime dividing .
  • Second Sylow says they’re all conjugate - there’s structurally only one “kind” of Sylow -subgroup.
  • Third Sylow counts them: is constrained by two divisibility conditions, often pinning it down uniquely.

Combined, the three theorems often determine all groups of a given order. Hugely powerful.

Note

The First Sylow Theorem generalises Cauchy’s theorem, which says: if divides , then has a subgroup of order (i.e. an element of order ). Sylow upgrades this to subgroups of order .

Quick Examples

Example: Group of Order 54

Question

Let . Show has a subgroup of order and one of order .

. By Sylow’s First Theorem applied with , has a Sylow -subgroup of order . Applied with , has a Sylow -subgroup of order .

Example: Sylow Subgroups of

. So has Sylow -subgroups of order and Sylow -subgroups of order .

  • Sylow -subgroup: .
  • Sylow -subgroup: any order- reflection generates one, .

Example: Sylow Subgroups of

. So Sylow -subgroups have order , Sylow -subgroups order , Sylow -subgroups order .

  • is a Sylow -subgroup.
  • is a Sylow -subgroup.
  • is a -subgroup but not Sylow (order , not ).

Application: Every Group of Order 162 has a Normal Subgroup of Order 81

Example

Let . Prove has a normal subgroup of order .

.

Claim 1. has a subgroup of order . By the First Sylow Theorem, the Sylow -subgroup exists.

Claim 2. is the only Sylow -subgroup. By the Third Sylow Theorem, and . The first condition says ; the second forces . The only common value is .

Claim 3. is normal. Fix . The conjugate is a subgroup (Quick Subgroup Test), with , so it is a Sylow -subgroup. Since there’s only one of those, for all . So .

Recurring pattern

If a Sylow -subgroup is unique (i.e. ), then it is automatically normal - because conjugation permutes the Sylow -subgroups, and there’s nothing else to permute it to.

Application: Every Group of Order 15 is Cyclic

Example

Let . Prove .

.

Claim 1. Subgroups of have orders (Lagrange).

Claim 2. Only the trivial subgroup has order , only has order .

Claim 3. has only one subgroup of order . By Sylow, every -subgroup of is a Sylow -subgroup (since , no larger -subgroup is possible). By the Third Sylow Theorem, and , giving .

Claim 4. has only one subgroup of order . Same argument with : and , so .

Claim 5. is cyclic. Let be the unique subgroup of order and the unique subgroup of order . The four subgroups of are . By inclusion-exclusion,

Since , there exists with and . Then , but , so . Hence is cyclic.

Proof of First Sylow (sketch - not examinable)

Note

Idea: act on subsets of size by left multiplication; use a divisibility argument and the Orbit-Stabiliser theorem to extract one whose stabiliser has order .

Let , . Let be the set of all subsets of of size . By a standard binomial-coefficient calculation,

A power of dividing also divides (and vice versa), so all -factors cancel between numerator and denominator. Hence .

acts on by . Partition into orbits; since , at least one orbit has . Let .

By Orbit-Stabiliser theorem, . Write with ; then . For we need , i.e. .

Now show . Fix and consider the orbit . If with , then (right-cancel by ). So . Also because stabilises . Hence .

Combined: , forcing , so . Thus is a Sylow -subgroup.

Proof of Second and Third Sylow (advanced - not examinable)

These rely on conjugation actions on the set of cosets (for the Second) and on the set of all Sylow -subgroups (for the Third), combined with the Orbit-Stabiliser theorem and a fixed-point argument. Definitions used:

  • Centraliser .
  • Normaliser for .
  • Conjugacy classes: orbits of on itself under .

Full proofs are in the lecture notes handout - examinable spirit is the application, not the derivation.


Pre-Lecture Notes from mth3003 lecture notes 17.pdf

  • -group: order is a prime power . Sylow -subgroup of : subgroup of size when , - the maximum possible -subgroup.
  • First Sylow Theorem: existence - for every prime , has at least one Sylow -subgroup.
  • Second Sylow Theorem: structure - all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate; every -subgroup sits inside some Sylow.
  • Third Sylow Theorem: counting - AND . Often pins uniquely.
  • Generalises Cauchy: prime subgroup of order (and now: order ).
  • Application 1: every group of order 162 has a normal subgroup of order 81. (Sylow uniqueness normality.)
  • Application 2: every group of order is cyclic. (Two unique Sylow subgroups; counting gives an element of order .)
  • Standard pattern: count via , often forces , hence the Sylow is normal, often the group is a direct product or cyclic.
  • Next lecture: more applications of Sylow - classifying small groups, finishing the course.