MTH3003 Lecture 8
Following on from last lecture, we can use our knowledge of Lagrange’s theorem to prove a few more things about finite groups, and then apply it to the dihedral groups we looked at previously.
Consequences of Lagrange’s Theorem
We know from Lagrange’s Theorem that if for a finite group , then . We can easily deduce two corollaries from this:
- The index of in is given by .
- For any element , its order must divide .
This is incredibly useful for disproving the existence of certain elements or subgroups within finite groups. For example, if we look at the dihedral group (which has order 10):
- It cannot contain an element of order , because does not divide .
- It cannot contain a subgroup of order , for the exact same reason.
Warning
The converse statement to Lagrange’s Theorem does not hold! Just because a number divides , this does not guarantee that has a subgroup of that order. The smallest counterexample is the Alternating Group of degree 4 (order 12), which has no subgroup of order 6.
Application: Understanding Dihedral Groups
Recall that the dihedral group , where is a rotation and the are reflections. We can use Lagrange’s Theorem to simplify how we represent these reflections.
Let . This is a subgroup of with size . Because , we can calculate the index of :
This means there are exactly two cosets of in . Let . Because a reflection cannot be a rotation, . Therefore, the two cosets must be and , giving us:
Because all the reflections are not in , they must all lie in . This means every single reflection can be written in the form . Thus, we can rewrite the entire group using only two generators:
Combining Rotations and Reflections
This simplified list is great, but calculating products like requires a trick. Because reverses the order of corners, it must be a reflection, meaning it has order 2. Therefore, , which implies:
Using the rule , along with and , we can simplify any combination of rotations and reflections into the standard form.
Simplifying
We can move to the left by pulling it through the s, inverting them as we go:
In cycle notation, if is the line of reflection through corner 1, it looks like
Pre-Lecture Notes from University Notes
- Corollaries of Lagrange’s Theorem: and divides .
- Warning that the converse of Lagrange’s Theorem is false (Alternating Group of degree 4 is a counterexample).
- Application of Lagrange’s Theorem to show that can be partitioned into two cosets: rotations and reflections .
- Redefining using only generators and : .
- Calculating products using the core relation to simplify combinations of rotations and reflections.