“substitute numerical values into formulae and expressions”
“simplify and manipulate algebraic expressions… by collecting like terms, multiplying a single term over a bracket, taking out common factors, expanding products”
“understand and use standard mathematical formulae; rearrange formulae to change the subject”
“use algebraic methods to solve linear equations in one variable (including all forms that require rearrangement)”
“use linear and quadratic graphs to estimate values… and to find approximate solutions of simultaneous linear equations”
“understand and use the concepts and vocabulary of expressions, equations, inequalities, terms, and factors”
Understanding: “Solving” means finding values; graphical solutions = coordinate points
Foundation: All future equation work builds on linear thinking
Graphical
Sketch of y=mx+c line with point marked
Sketch of two intersecting lines
Captions: “Point ON line is a solution” / “Intersection = simultaneous solution”
Key Stage 4 Section (Year 10 to 11) - Middle Box
What’s Learned (from National Curriculum)
“extend fluency with expressions and equations from key stage 3, to include quadratic equations, simultaneous equations and inequalities”
“factorising quadratic expressions of the form x² + bx + c, including the difference of two squares; factorising quadratic expressions of the form ax2+bx+c”
“identify and interpret roots, intercepts, and turning points of quadratic functions graphically; deduce roots algebraically and turning points by completing the square”
“solve quadratic equations… algebraically by factorising, by completing the square and by using the quadratic formula; find approximate solutions using a graph”
“solve two simultaneous equations in two variables (linear/linear or linear/quadratic) algebraically; find approximate solutions using a graph”
“find approximate solutions to equations numerically using iteration”
“know the difference between an equation and an identity”
“solve linear inequalities in one or two variables, and quadratic inequalities in one variable; represent the solution set on a number line, using set notation and on a graph”
“+1 Technique”: What if equation isn’t linear? Need factorising, formula, or approximation
Graphical
Sketch of parabola with marked x-intercepts (roots)
Three small parabolas showing 0, 1, 2 roots (discriminant)
Caption: “Roots are where curve crosses x-axis” / “Discriminant tells us how many”
Key Stage 5 Section (Year 12 to 13) - Top Box
What’s Learned (from National Curriculum)
“Work with quadratic functions and their graphs; the discriminant… completing the square; solution of quadratic equations including solving quadratic equations in a function of the unknown”
“Solve simultaneous equations in two variables by elimination and by substitution, including one linear and one quadratic equation”
“Solve equations of the form ax=b”
“Solve simple trigonometric equations in a given interval, including quadratic equations in sin, cos, and tan and equations involving multiples of the unknown angle”
“Locate roots of f(x)=0 by considering changes of sign… Understand how the change of sign methods can fail”
“Solve equations using the Newton-Raphson method and other recurrence relations… Understand how such methods can fail”
“Evaluate the analytical solution of simple first order differential equations with separable variables”
“Solve linear and quadratic inequalities in a single variable and interpret such inequalities graphically”
“Understand and use parametric equations of curves“
Understanding: Not all equations have closed-form solutions; approximation is powerful; equations can model real-world change
“+1 Technique”: What if we can’t factorise OR use a formula? Need logs, trig identities, or numerical methods
Graphical
Sketch of exponential curve intersecting horizontal line
Small Newton-Raphson tangent iteration diagram
Caption: “Solution = where f(x) = g(x)” / “Numerical methods approximate via tangents”
Poster Misconceptions Content
Key Stage 3 Misconceptions
“Treating ’=’ as ‘makes’ or ‘the answer is’ rather than equivalence” [Swan, 2001]
“Believing x + 3 = 7 means ‘x and 3 makes 7’ (concatenation thinking)” [Booth, 1984]
“Cannot work with negative numbers in equations” [Common diagnostic]
“Letter-number reversal: 2x=x2” [Küchemann, 1981]
Key Stage 4 Misconceptions
“Forgetting ± when solving x² = 9” [Common error analysis]
“Confusing equations (solve for x) with identities (true for all x)” [Kieran, 2007]
“Thinking all quadratics factorise nicely” [Watson, 2009]
“Dividing both sides by a variable that might be zero” [Tall & Vinner, 1981]
“Believing ‘completing the square’ is separate from quadratic formula (not seeing connection)“
Key Stage 5 Misconceptions
“Forgetting domain restrictions when using logarithms (x > 0)” [Common calculus error]
“Not recognising when numerical methods are necessary vs. analytical solutions”
“Ignoring convergence/divergence in iterative methods” [Numerical methods research]
“Treating dy/dx as a fraction that can be separated arbitrarily” [Tall, 1992]
Poster Learning Theories Content
1. Schema Theory (Piaget)
Theory: Knowledge organised in connected schemas; new learning integrates into existing structures
Application: Equations shouldn’t be taught as disconnected procedures but as linked progression
Implication: Explicitly show how quadratics build on linears; how exponentials extend algebra
Citation: Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children
2. Variation Theory (Marton)
Theory: Learning occurs through experiencing variation against invariance
Application: “+1 technique” embodies this—what stays same (solving process) and what changes (complexity)
Implication: Design tasks that vary equation type while keeping solving structure constant
Citation: Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning
3. Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky)
Theory: Learning occurs in zone between what student can do alone vs. with support
Application: Each equation level should be in ZPD of previous; Key Stage 4 quadratics in ZPD of Key Stage 3 linears
Implication: Don’t rush progression; ensure mastery before advancing complexity
Citation: Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society
4. Dual Coding Theory (Paivio/Mayer)
Theory: Information encoded both verbally and visually is better retained and understood
Application: Teaching equations requires both algebraic manipulation AND graphical representation
Implication: Always show graph alongside equation; make connections explicit
Citation: Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.)
5. Constructivism (Bruner)
Theory: Learners construct knowledge by building on prior understanding
Application: Equation solving is cumulative—each new type constructed from previous
Implication: Diagnose gaps in prior knowledge before teaching new equation types
Citation: Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction
Poster Design Specifications
Colour Palette
Introduction boxes: Light blue (#E3F2FD)
Key Stage 3 box: Light blue (#BBDEFB)
Key Stage 4 box: Medium blue (#64B5F6)
Key Stage 5 box: Dark blue (#1976D2)
Skills column: Light green (#C8E6C9)
Graph column: Light grey (#F5F5F5)
Misconceptions: Light orange (#FFE0B2)
Learning theory: Light purple (#E1BEE7)
Conclusion: Teal (#B2DFDB)
References: White (#FFFFFF)
Text: All dark grey/black (#212121) for contrast
Typography
Main title: 36pt bold, sans-serif
Section headings: 24pt bold
Subheadings: 16pt bold
Body text: 12-13pt regular
Captions: 11pt italic
References: 10pt regular
Font: Arial or Helvetica throughout
Spacing
Margins: 2.5cm all sides
Gutters: 1.5cm between major sections
Internal padding: 1cm within boxes
Line spacing: 1.2-1.5 for readability
Poster Key Reference to Include
Curriculum Documents (Primary sources)
Department for Education, “Mathematics programmes of study: key stage 3,” National Curriculum in England, 2013.
Department for Education, “Mathematics programmes of study: key stage 4,” National Curriculum in England, 2014.
Department for Education, “GCE AS and A level subject content for mathematics,” 2016.
Learning Theory
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, 1978.
J. Piaget, The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge, 1950.
R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
F. Marton, Necessary Conditions of Learning. Routledge, 2015.
J. S. Bruner, Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press, 1966.
Algebra Education Research
C. Kieran, “Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels,” in Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2007, pp. 707-762.
L. R. Booth, “Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors,” NFER-Nelson, 1984.
M. Swan, “Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics,” in Issues in Mathematics Teaching, 2001, pp. 147-165.
D. Küchemann, “Algebra,” in Children’s Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16, 1981, pp. 102-119.
Cognitive Science
J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257-285, 1988.
D. Tall and S. Vinner, “Concept image and concept definition in mathematics,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 12, pp. 151-169, 1981.
Additional (as Needed for Specific points)
[15-20] More specific algebra misconceptions, pedagogy, or assessment research