Guest Lecture Anonymous Code Statistics

Overview

This document compiles statistics on all anonymous codes identified in the MTH3011 guest lecture peer assessment submissions.

---

All Identified Anonymous Codes

Article Writers (by filename)

Code	Week 2	Week 3	Week 5	Week 6	Week 8	Week 9	Week 11	Total Articles
15100	✓		✓		✓		✓	4
20628	✓							1
26742	✓		✓		✓		✓	4
26990	✓	✓	✓				✓	4
31102	✓		✓		✓		✓	4
31842				✓		✓	✓	3
42890	✓							1
46422		✓		✓		✓		3
46509	✓		✓					2
50823			✓					1
56001	✓		✓		✓		✓	4
63839	✓							1
63865		✓	✓				✓	3
63893			✓		✓			2
69356		✓		✓		✓		3
76354		✓	✓			✓		3
83274	✓			✓				2
90561		✓		✓	✓		✓	4
92913		✓		✓	✓		✓	4
93367							✓	1
94931	✓		✓		✓			3
96814	✓		✓		✓			3
9463	✓							1

---

Feedback Givers (from Quote blocks)

Code	Feedback Given
9463	1
15100	3
17304	4
18476	2
26742	1
26801	5
26990	4
31102	4
31842	8
34068	1
41058	5
42890	18
42994	3
45170	1
46422	4
46509	4
46551	3
50823	2
56001	4
60795	4
62451	5
62557	3
63865	1
63893	3
67384	4
69356	3
69585	1
76354	4
79578	4
81177	4
82157	1
90561	11
92913	4
93367	4
94931	5
96814	5

---

Summary Statistics

Top Article Writers (wrote 4+ articles)

1. 15100 - 4 articles
2. 26742 - 4 articles
3. 26990 - 4 articles
4. 31102 - 4 articles
5. 56001 - 4 articles
6. 90561 - 4 articles
7. 92913 - 4 articles

Top Feedback Givers (gave 5+ feedback)

1. 42890 - 18 feedback comments
2. 90561 - 11 feedback comments
3. 31842 - 8 feedback comments
4. 26801 - 5 feedback comments
5. 41058 - 5 feedback comments
6. 62451 - 5 feedback comments
7. 94931 - 5 feedback comments
8. 96814 - 5 feedback comments

---

Participation by Week

Week 2 - Sphere Packings (12 articles)

Writers: 15100, 20628, 26742, 31102, 42890, 46509, 56001, 63839, 83274, 9463, 94931, 96814

Week 3 - Planetary Rings (7 articles)

Writers: 26990, 46422, 63865, 69356, 76354, 90561, 92913

Week 5 - Ethics in Science (12 articles)

Writers: 15100, 26742, 26990, 31102, 46509, 50823, 56001, 63865, 63893, 76354, 94931, 96814

Week 6 - Quantum Dots (6 articles)

Writers: 31842, 46422, 69356, 83274, 90561, 92913

Week 8 - Lotka-Volterra Systems (9 articles)

Writers: 15100, 26742, 31102, 56001, 63893, 90561, 92913, 94931, 96814

Week 9 - Jumping Random Walks (4 articles)

Writers: 31842, 46422, 69356, 76354

Week 11 - Largest Telescopes (10 articles)

Writers: 15100, 26742, 26990, 31102, 31842, 56001, 63865, 90561, 92913, 93367

---

Complete Code Directory

All Unique Codes Identified (sorted numerically)

Article writers: 9463, 15100, 20628, 26742, 26990, 31102, 31842, 42890, 46422, 46509, 50823, 56001, 63839, 63865, 63893, 69356, 76354, 83274, 90561, 92913, 93367, 94931, 96814

Total unique article writers: 23

Feedback givers: 9463, 15100, 17304, 18476, 26742, 26801, 26990, 31102, 31842, 34068, 41058, 42890, 42994, 45170, 46422, 46509, 46551, 50823, 56001, 60795, 62451, 62557, 63865, 63893, 67384, 69356, 69585, 76354, 79578, 81177, 82157, 90561, 92913, 93367, 94931, 96814

Total unique feedback givers: 36

---

Codes Active in Both Roles

The following codes both wrote articles AND gave feedback:

Code	Articles Written	Feedback Given
9463	1	1
15100	4	3
26742	4	1
26990	4	4
31102	4	4
31842	3	8
42890	1	18
46422	3	4
46509	2	4
50823	1	2
56001	4	4
63865	3	1
63893	2	3
69356	3	3
76354	3	4
90561	4	11
92913	4	4
93367	1	4
94931	3	5
96814	3	5

Total codes active in both roles: 20

---

Codes Only in One Role

Only Wrote Articles (no Feedback given)

• 20628
• 63839
• 83274

Only Gave Feedback (no Articles written)

• 17304
• 18476
• 26801
• 34068
• 41058
• 42994
• 45170
• 46551
• 60795
• 62451
• 62557
• 67384
• 69585
• 79578
• 81177
• 82157

---

Total Activity Summary

Metric	Count
Total unique anonymous codes	39
Codes who wrote articles	23
Codes who gave feedback	36
Codes who did both	20
Codes who only wrote	3
Codes who only gave feedback	16
Total articles written	60
Total feedback comments	~140

---

DETAILED MARKING ANALYSIS

Marking Rubric Reference (Max 15 points)

Criterion	0	1	2	3
1. Presentation	All absent	One absent	One incorrect	All correct
2. Content	Nearly absent	Partial	One aspect absent	All present
3. Context	All absent	Partial	One type absent	All present
4. Style	Neither present	Partial	Both present	Exceeds
5. External Sources	None	Partial	One missing	All met (ref + quote)

---

Blog Marks by Article Code

Week 2 - Sphere Packings

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
15100	3	3	2	3	2	13/15	Missing direct quote; good flow
26742	2	3	2	2	3	12/15	Some grammar issues; good sources
20628	3	3	2	2	3	13/15	Multiple reviewers gave 13/15
31102	2	3	3	3	1	12/15	Sentence cut off; no direct quote
42890	3	3	2	3	2	13/15	Good depth; needs title
46509	3	3	2	3	3	14/15	One reviewer noted minor grammar
56001	2	3	2	3	2	12/15	Missing references; good style
63839	2	3	2	2	2	11/15	Grammar issues; limited sources
83274	3	3	2	3	3	14/15	Well written; quote included
9463	2	3	2	2	2	11/15	Grammar/typos noted
94931	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Excellent - reviewer said “brilliant”
96814	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Very good; needs quote

Week 3 - Planetary Rings

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
26990	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	No direct quote needed
46422	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Excellent throughout
63865	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Needs direct quote
69356	2	3	2	2	2	11/15	Move date to start; expand context
76354	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	”Excellent piece of work”
90561	2	3	3	3	3	14/15	Minor grammar; great content
92913	3	3	2	2	2	12/15	Missing societal context; no quote

Week 5 - Ethics in Science

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
15100	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Good; needs direct quote
26742	2	2	2	2	3	11/15	Missing six values; good quotes
26990	3	3	3	2	2	13/15	Could be more engaging intro
31102	3	3	3	2	2	13/15	Minor typos; good coverage
46509	3	3	2	3	2	13/15	Missing research context
50823	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Excellent; needs quote
56001	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Good overall; needs quote
63865	2	3	3	3	2	13/15	Typos (Kanitan, Adrew)
63893	3	2	2	3	3	13/15	Quote from Gita; missing virtue ethics
76354	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Very good; minor notes
94931	3	3	2	3	1	12/15	No outside sources
96814	2	3	2	2	2	11/15	Layout issues; needs quote

Week 6 - Quantum Dots

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
31842	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Multiple quotes; excellent
46422	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Very thorough
69356	3	3	2	3	2	13/15	Good but brief
83274	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Missing quote
90561	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Clear; needs quote
92913	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Detailed overview

Week 8 - Lotka-Volterra Systems

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
15100	3	2	2	2	2	11/15	Missing examples; no quote
26742	2	2	1	2	3	10/15	Grammar; societal context weak
31102	2	3	2	3	2	12/15	No title; engaging style
56001	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Excellent - Goodwin quote
63893	2	3	2	3	2	12/15	Layout issues
90561	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Very good; add quote
92913	2	2	1	2	3	10/15	Too technical; societal weak
94931	3	3	3	2	2	13/15	Good; some terms undefined
96814	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Good; repeat in para 3

Week 9 - Jumping Random Walks

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
31842	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Needs depth in refs
46422	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	14-15/15 from reviewer
69356	3	3	3	2	3	14/15	Some terms undefined
76354	3	3	2	3	2	13/15	Research context needed

Week 11 - Largest Telescopes

Code	Pres	Content	Context	Style	Sources	Total	Notes
15100	2	2	2	2	2	10/15	Missing Katharine’s research; typo
26742	3	3	2	2	2	12/15	Good; needs quote
26990	2	3	3	3	3	14/15	Typo; good refs
31102	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Needs direct quote
31842	3	3	3	2	2	13/15	Word count high; no quote
56001	3	3	3	3	2	14/15	Good; needs quote
63865	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Personal connection; excellent
90561	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Quote included; engaging
92913	2	2	2	2	2	10/15	Blocky layout; basic
93367	3	3	3	3	3	15/15	Long but comprehensive

---

Estimated Overall Blog Averages by Code

Code	Articles	Avg Score	Grade Band
94931	3	13.3/15	First (89%)
46422	3	15.0/15	First (100%)
56001	4	13.8/15	First (92%)
76354	3	14.0/15	First (93%)
31842	3	14.0/15	First (93%)
90561	4	14.3/15	First (95%)
26990	4	13.5/15	First (90%)
31102	4	12.8/15	First (85%)
15100	4	12.0/15	2:1 (80%)
63865	3	14.0/15	First (93%)
92913	4	11.5/15	2:1 (77%)
69356	3	12.7/15	First (85%)
83274	2	14.0/15	First (93%)
26742	4	11.3/15	2:1 (75%)
96814	3	13.0/15	First (87%)
46509	2	13.5/15	First (90%)
20628	1	13.0/15	First (87%)
42890	1	13.0/15	First (87%)
63839	1	11.0/15	2:1 (73%)
9463	1	11.0/15	2:1 (73%)
50823	1	14.0/15	First (93%)
63893	2	12.5/15	First (83%)
93367	1	15.0/15	First (100%)

---

Feedback Quality Assessment

Rubric for Feedback Quality (Max 10 points)

Criterion	Poor (0-1)	Adequate (2)	Good (3)	Excellent (4)
Specificity	Vague	Some detail	Specific points	Highly detailed
Constructiveness	None/harsh	Basic	Suggestions given	Actionable advice
Coverage	1-2 criteria	3 criteria	4-5 criteria	All + extras

Feedback Giver Scores

Code	Feedback Given	Avg Quality	Notes
96814	5	9/10	Extremely detailed; full rubric breakdown; actionable suggestions
42890	18	6/10	Consistent but often brief; “looks good” common
90561	10	7/10	Good balance of praise and suggestions
31842	7	8/10	Detailed rubric-based scoring; thorough
62451	6	8/10	Full rubric coverage; constructive
26801	5	8/10	Detailed breakdown; specific scores
41058	5	8/10	Thorough criterion-by-criterion
60795	5	7/10	Good structure; some brief
94931	5	7/10	Rubric-based; occasionally brief
79578	4	9/10	Very detailed; constructive; friendly
67384	4	8/10	Full breakdown; clear grades
93367	4	7/10	Good structure; brief suggestions
92913	4	7/10	Criterion-based; helpful
81177	4	6/10	Covers criteria but brief
56001	4	7/10	Positive; constructive
76354	4	7/10	Thoughtful; encouraging
46551	4	6/10	Brief but helpful
62557	3	7/10	Structured; detailed scores
42994	3	8/10	Very thorough; constructive
46509	3	8/10	Full rubric; clear scoring
46422	3	8/10	Detailed; good suggestions
63893	3	6/10	Brief; some suggestions
31102	3	7/10	Helpful; specific points
15100	3	6/10	Encouraging but brief
50823	2	7/10	Good detail when given
69356	2	8/10	Full breakdown
26990	2	7/10	Helpful; encouraging
18476	2	5/10	Very brief
17304	4	7/10	Criterion-based; consistent
9463	1	6/10	Adequate
26742	1	7/10	Detailed for one comment
34068	1	8/10	Very thorough
45170	1	6/10	Brief but specific
63865	1	8/10	Detailed with SPaG notes
69585	1	7/10	Constructive
82157	1	7/10	Good points

---

Combined Performance Rankings

Top Performers (Writing + Reviewing Combined)

Rank	Code	Blog Avg	Feedback Qty	Feedback Quality	Overall Assessment
1	56001	13.8/15	4	7/10	Outstanding - Consistent high quality
2	90561	14.3/15	10	7/10	Outstanding - Prolific & quality
3	46422	15.0/15	3	8/10	Outstanding - Perfect blogs
4	76354	14.0/15	4	7/10	Excellent - Strong both areas
5	31842	14.0/15	7	8/10	Excellent - Very thorough
6	96814	13.0/15	5	9/10	Excellent - Best feedback quality
7	31102	12.8/15	3	7/10	Very Good - Solid contributor
8	26990	13.5/15	2	7/10	Very Good - Strong blogs
9	94931	13.3/15	5	7/10	Very Good - Consistent
10	69356	12.7/15	2	8/10	Good - Quality focus

Feedback-Only Contributors (Top Quality)

Rank	Code	Feedback Qty	Quality	Notes
1	79578	4	9/10	Exceptionally detailed and constructive
2	42994	3	8/10	Very thorough analysis
3	67384	4	8/10	Clear rubric-based approach
4	62451	6	8/10	Consistent quality across many
5	41058	5	8/10	Criterion-by-criterion coverage
6	26801	5	8/10	Detailed breakdown style

Areas for Improvement

Code	Issue	Recommendation
42890	18 feedbacks but often “looks good”	Add more specific suggestions
26742	Avg 11.3/15 on blogs	Address grammar; add quotes
92913	Technical level too high	Simplify for lay audience
15100	Missing direct quotes	Always include a quoted opinion
63839	Only 1 article, limited sources	Expand external research

---

Grade Distribution Summary

Blog Grades (60 Total articles)

Grade Band	Count	Percentage
First (70%+, 11-15/15)	52	87%
2:1 (60-69%, 9-10/15)	7	12%
2:2 (50-59%, 8/15)	1	2%
Third/Fail (<50%)	0	0%

Feedback Quality Distribution

Quality Band	Count	Percentage
Excellent (8-10)	12	33%
Good (6-7)	22	61%
Adequate (4-5)	2	6%
Poor (0-3)	0	0%